Back in late November I posted the following 2015 standings as predicted by the Steamer projections:
WAR 2015:
Old Detroit: 49.0 WARCottage: 47.3Pittsburgh: 40.2Peshastin: 35.5Portland: 32.8Flint Hill: 24.9Haviland: 24.4Canberra: 23.2Kaline: 18.7
These aren’t very satisfying standings since they don’t show our projected records. And also there’ve been a lot of changes in our rosters since then. So here are the standings for the end of 2015 as projected by Steamer as of right after the Rule 5 Draft:
Team | Off WAR | PitWAR | W | L | .pct | GB | Total WAR | |||||
Seattle | 24.9 | 13.9 | 89 | 73 | 0.551 | 0.0 | 38.8 | |||||
LAA | 27.2 | 7.1 | 85 | 77 | 0.523 | 4.5 | 34.3 | |||||
OAK | 23.1 | 10 | 84 | 78 | 0.516 | 5.7 | 33.1 | |||||
TEX | 19.5 | 11.1 | 81 | 81 | 0.501 | 8.2 | 30.6 | |||||
HD | 14.0 | 11.5 | 76 | 86 | 0.469 | 13.3 | 25.5 | |||||
HOU | 16.4 | 7.8 | 75 | 87 | 0.461 | 14.6 | 24.2 | |||||
KD | 12.6 | 6.9 | 70 | 92 | 0.432 | 19.3 | 19.5 | |||||
—— | —— | —— | —— | —– | —– | —- | —— | —- | —– | —- | —— | |
PA | 23.9 | 10 | 84 | 78 | 0.521 | 0.0 | 33.9 | |||||
DET | 23.9 | 10.9 | 85 | 77 | 0.527 | -0.9 | 34.8 | |||||
CLE | 21 | 12.9 | 84 | 78 | 0.521 | 0.0 | 33.9 | |||||
KC | 23.2 | 10.5 | 84 | 78 | 0.520 | 0.2 | 33.7 | |||||
MIN | 17.7 | 10.5 | 79 | 83 | 0.486 | 5.7 | 28.2 | |||||
CWS | 14.4 | 11.5 | 76 | 86 | 0.472 | 8.0 | 25.9 | |||||
—— | —— | —— | —— | —– | —- | —- | —— | —- | —– | —- | —— | |
OD | 32.1 | 14.1 | 97 | 65 | 0.597 | 0.0 | 46.2 | |||||
BOS | 29.1 | 13 | 93 | 69 | 0.572 | 4.1 | 42.1 | |||||
TB | 23.4 | 9.5 | 83 | 79 | 0.515 | 13.3 | 32.9 | |||||
NYY | 20.2 | 13.2 | 84 | 78 | 0.518 | 12.8 | 33.4 | |||||
TOR | 26.2 | 9.5 | 86 | 76 | 0.532 | 10.5 | 35.7 | |||||
BAL | 24.6 | 6.7 | 82 | 80 | 0.505 | 14.9 | 31.3 | |||||
FH | 18.7 | 6 | 75 | 87 | 0.464 | 21.5 | 24.7 | |||||
LAD | 25.1 | 14.4 | 90 | 72 | 0.556 | 0.0 | 39.5 | |||||
PP | 24.1 | 12.9 | 87 | 75 | 0.540 | 2.5 | 37 | |||||
PR | 20.7 | 10 | 81 | 81 | 0.501 | 8.8 | 30.7 | |||||
COL | 19.5 | 10.6 | 81 | 81 | 0.497 | 9.4 | 30.1 | |||||
SF | 20.9 | 9.1 | 80 | 82 | 0.497 | 9.5 | 30 | |||||
SD | 15.8 | 6.3 | 73 | 89 | 0.448 | 17.4 | 22.1 | |||||
ARI | 14.2 | 7 | 72 | 90 | 0.443 | 18.3 | 21.2 | |||||
—— | —— | —— | —— | —– | —– | —- | —— | —- | —– | —- | —— | |
CC | 30.8 | 14.4 | 96 | 66 | 0.591 | 0.0 | 45.2 | |||||
STL | 25.3 | 11.3 | 87 | 75 | 0.538 | 8.6 | 36.6 | |||||
PIT | 23.6 | 10.5 | 85 | 77 | 0.522 | 11.1 | 34.1 | |||||
CHC | 16.4 | 12 | 79 | 83 | 0.487 | 16.8 | 28.4 | |||||
MIL | 17.9 | 8.4 | 77 | 85 | 0.474 | 18.9 | 26.3 | |||||
CIN | 17.2 | 8.4 | 76 | 86 | 0.470 | 19.6 | 25.6 | |||||
—— | —— | —— | —— | —– | —– | —- | —– | —- | —– | —- | —— | |
WAS | 27.4 | 14.3 | 92 | 70 | 0.569 | 0.0 | 41.7 | |||||
MIA | 17.8 | 11 | 79 | 83 | 0.489 | 12.9 | 28.8 | |||||
NYM | 17.2 | 8.1 | 76 | 86 | 0.468 | 16.4 | 25.3 | |||||
CK | 19 | 4.4 | 74 | 88 | 0.456 | 18.3 | 23.4 | |||||
ATL | 12 | 6.8 | 69 | 93 | 0.428 | 22.9 | 18.8 | |||||
PHI | 8.7 | 5.1 | 64 | 98 | 0.397 | 27.9 | 13.8 |
The Wolverine lead over the Cheese shrank from 1.7 games to only 1.0. Other stuff happened, too, probably.
Yesterday I noticed that Baseball Prospectus had come out with their projections. So I updated our rosters on BP and got their numbers. The standings at the end of 2015 according to BP are going to look something like this…
PECOTA | ||||||||||||
Team | Off WAR | PitWAR | W | L | .pct | GB | Total WAR | |||||
LAA | 27.6 | 10 | 90 | 72 | 0.556 | 0.0 | 37.6 | |||||
SEA | 24.9 | 9.7 | 87 | 75 | 0.537 | 3.0 | 34.6 | |||||
OAK | 23.8 | 9.7 | 84 | 78 | 0.518 | 6.0 | 33.5 | |||||
TEX | 19.5 | 8.4 | 83 | 79 | 0.512 | 7.0 | 27.9 | |||||
HOU | 18 | 4.7 | 77 | 85 | 0.475 | 13.0 | 22.7 | |||||
KD | 11 | 5.5 | 69 | 93 | 0.425 | 21.2 | 16.5 | |||||
HD | 10.2 | 4.9 | 67 | 95 | 0.416 | 22.6 | 15.1 | |||||
PA | 23.9 | 10 | 86 | 76 | 0.532 | 0.0 | 33.9 | |||||
DET | 17.7 | 9.7 | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | 4.2 | 27.4 | |||||
CLE | 19.5 | 7.3 | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | 5.2 | 26.8 | |||||
CWS | 16.4 | 6.2 | 73 | 89 | 0.451 | 13.1 | 22.6 | |||||
KC | 17.9 | 4.7 | 72 | 90 | 0.444 | 14.2 | 22.6 | |||||
MIN | 14.4 | 1.5 | 70 | 92 | 0.432 | 16.2 | 15.9 | |||||
OD | 30.3 | 6.8 | 89 | 73 | 0.552 | 0.0 | 37.1 | |||||
TB | 23.4 | 11.4 | 86 | 76 | 0.531 | 3.4 | 34.8 | |||||
BOS | 28.7 | 4.2 | 86 | 76 | 0.531 | 3.4 | 32.9 | |||||
TOR | 22.6 | 5.5 | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | 7.4 | 28.1 | |||||
NYY | 18.3 | 7.2 | 80 | 82 | 0.494 | 9.4 | 25.5 | |||||
BAL | 18.7 | 6.9 | 78 | 84 | 0.481 | 11.4 | 25.6 | |||||
FH | 17.2 | 5.3 | 75 | 87 | 0.462 | 14.6 | 22.5 | |||||
Team | Off WAR | PitWAR | W | L | .pct | GB | ||||||
LAD | 26.9 | 17 | 97 | 65 | 0.599 | 0.0 | 43.9 | |||||
PP | 25.4 | 11.4 | 89 | 73 | 0.550 | 7.9 | 36.8 | |||||
SF | 18.2 | 11.3 | 84 | 78 | 0.519 | 13.0 | 29.5 | |||||
SD | 21.5 | 8.7 | 83 | 79 | 0.512 | 14.0 | 30.2 | |||||
ARI | 16.9 | 7.3 | 74 | 88 | 0.457 | 23.0 | 24.2 | |||||
COL | 19.2 | 4.2 | 74 | 88 | 0.456 | 23.1 | 23.4 | |||||
PR | 16.8 | 3.3 | 72 | 90 | 0.447 | 24.6 | 20.1 | |||||
CC | 29.3 | 8.3 | 90 | 72 | 0.555 | 0.0 | 37.6 | |||||
STL | 26.7 | 12.5 | 89 | 73 | 0.549 | 0.9 | 39.2 | |||||
CHC | 21.1 | 7.8 | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | 7.9 | 28.9 | |||||
PIT | 23.5 | 4.1 | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | 8.9 | 27.6 | |||||
CIN | 20.8 | 8.4 | 79 | 83 | 0.488 | 10.9 | 29.2 | |||||
MIL | 21.9 | 6.2 | 79 | 83 | 0.488 | 10.9 | 28.1 | |||||
WAS | 23.6 | 16.7 | 91 | 71 | 0.562 | 0.0 | 40.3 | |||||
NYM | 22.6 | 7.5 | 82 | 80 | 0.506 | 9.0 | 30.1 | |||||
MIA | 18.8 | 9.8 | 81 | 81 | 0.500 | 10.0 | 28.6 | |||||
ATL | 12.9 | 7.9 | 74 | 88 | 0.457 | 17.0 | 20.8 | |||||
CK | 18 | 3.3 | 74 | 88 | 0.454 | 17.4 | 21.3 | |||||
PHI | 13.4 | 5.3 | 69 | 93 | 0.426 | 22.0 | 18.7 |
So, unless we alter our rosters between now and then, the two-way race where the Wolverines edge out the Cheese becomes a three-way race with the Cheese very narrowly on top and the W’s with a microscopic (more likely illusory) edge over the Pears. The Alleghenys lurk just a little back in both versions, ready to swoop in and steal the prize if anyone falters.
I don’t like the BP projections all that much, and not just because they predict the Cheese to forget their station in life. Unlike the Steamer projections, MLB teams’ overall records do not balance with BP’s predicted WAR for each player. BP adjusts the players’ WAR totals in some way that differs from team to team to get the predicted team ratings. The EFL teams “enjoy” no such fudge factors.
Also, BP can be unbelievably harsh. Welington Castillo’s predicted WAR at catcher is only 0.1 according to BP, compared to Steamer’s 0.6. And Corey Kluber falls from 4.0 all the way to 0.7. Other teams suffer similar oppressions.
If you want to see your team’s projections I advise you to subscribe to BP. Or you can drop me a line and I’ll cut and paste them for you.
But don’t let it worry you too much. This is all subject to change, since we are going to alter our rosters. The Rookie Draft is just over three weeks away (on Feb 21 at 1:00)!