Yesterday I stumbled upon an article on the on-line NY times where some “experts” provided links to their favorite clips of music, 5 minutes or less. Most of them were mod-ern stuff, with the stressed “melodies” and winning combination of ear-rending screeches and numbing repetition that comes with music aimed at others in on the game they’re playing. John Cage’s 4’33” (four and a half minutes of silence — in three movements, of course) was a fitting finale, composed (I presume) after a day of listening to all those other modern pieces. (You can listen to my even-better 4’34” by clicking right here.
I hope you enjoyed my musical homage to John Cage. I am working on securing the copyright for this masterpiece, at least for the last second, which is the original part.
.
I am sorry to inform you my favorites among the dozen or so samples in the NY Times articles are throwback, low-brow standards like Beethoven, Ravel, Stravinsky, Strauss. I pined for some Mozart and Bach, which were missing.
But for some reason I was most drawn this time to Wagner. One expert had picked Isolde’s — hmmm, is it always an aria when one person is singing in opera? I think we just plumbed the depth of my knowledge of classical music. Anyway, it’s from Tristan und Isolde, and it’s called “Liebestod.” (You have to scroll all the way to the bottom, just above Yuval Sharon’s apology for not giving you a link to 4’33”.)
The music is familiar but since (1) the singing is in German, and (2) it’s opera so you’d be lucky to understand it if it was in English, I have never understood what is going on. So I looked up the lyrics in translation. I still didn’t really understand, so I found a commentary: Tristan has died. Isolde is contemplating his body when she sees him come back to life, and begins hearing beautiful music. Her friends can neither see the resurrection, nor hear the music. In the end she succumbs to the hallucination and dies in a state of utter bliss.
Kind of like the Wolverines, up until Tommy Pham came along.
EFL Standings for 2018
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
RS |
RA |
Portland Rosebuds |
90 |
50 |
.644 |
— |
752.8 |
547.7 |
Old Detroit Wolverines |
91 |
51 |
.642 |
— |
703.8 |
516.7 |
Brookland Outs |
80 |
60 |
.574 |
9.8 |
746.1 |
649.9 |
Canberra Kangaroos |
79 |
62 |
.560 |
11.7 |
652.0 |
582.6 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys |
75 |
66 |
.535 |
15.2 |
746.2 |
700.6 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes |
74 |
68 |
.520 |
17.4 |
655.2 |
625.4 |
Haviland Dragons |
71 |
70 |
.502 |
19.8 |
658.2 |
649.1 |
Cottage Cheese |
67 |
73 |
.481 |
22.8 |
667.5 |
693.0 |
Kaline Drive |
66 |
75 |
.468 |
24.6 |
610.5 |
652.8 |
Peshastin Pears |
65 |
75 |
.464 |
25.2 |
599.0 |
645.0 |
D.C. Balk |
62 |
79 |
.437 |
29 |
614.4 |
696.4 |
.
Portland: W, 7 – 4. (69 PA, .382, .478, .945; 10 ip, 6 er, 5.40 ERA). Pham lifted the Rosebuds in two ways. First, his stats were not compiling in our database because when I tried to fix a problem (Pham’s name in the database did not exactly match his name in BP) I didn’t finish the job right and the database wasn’t compiling his stats with the rest of the team’s. I fixed that flaw this morning — just in time, because last night Pham homered and walked in four plate appearances. So Pham brought his 1.833 daily OPS, and his 1.185 September mark, just in time to complete the Rosebud’s daily 1.423 OPS and rise to the top of the EFL.
.
Old Detroit: “L”, 5 – 5. (40 PA, .400, .475, .857; 4 ip, 4 er, 9.00 ERA). Up until their dreams were phamished (EFL Dictionary: “To phamish”: vt, to suddenly disillusion an opponent by having your erroneously excluded stats suddenly included in your team’s results) the Wolverines were exulting in the beautiful music of a 1.337 daily team OPS featuring Lewis Brinson’s trumpet call (3 for 4 with a double and a homer) announcing his resurrection as an elite prospect and an un-looked-for boost to Old Detroit’s fading hopes:
seht iht, Freunde? See it Friend?
Seht ihrs nicht? Dont you see?
Immerlichter, wie er leuchtet Ever lighter, how he's shining
Sternumstrahlet hoch sich hebt? Borne on high amongst the stars?
Seht ihrs nicht? Dont you see?
Seriously. Don’t you see it?
Brookland: DNP, 0 – 0. (52 PA, .250, .308, .396; 12.3 ip, 6 er, 4.38 ERA).I am suspicious of that 0 – o score. Sure, it’s possible to score 0 – 0 in the EFL, but it’s exceptionally improbable. But both the Outs and the Cheese achieved this on the same day. The Cubs/Nats game got rained out, so the standings do not advance a game today — but this 0 – 0 result for both teams suggests to me that somehow our database might have boycotted updating the stats on our teams in the NL Central. Is that possible? Or am I hallucinating again?
.
Canberra: “W”, 4 – 4. (41 PA, .289, .341, .395; 12 ip, 4 er, 3.00). Most of us would look at that 3.00 ERA over 12 innings with envy. But this result pushed the Kangaroo’s September ERA up from 1.86 all the way to 2.04. Their 6 – 1 record is the best in the league for September, with a winning percentage tucked between Portland’s .827 (over 5 games) and Old Detroit’s .755 (over 6 games).
.
Pittsburgh: L, 5 – 6. (34 PA, .167, .235, .267; 14.3 ip, 4 er, 2.51 ERA). The A’s are right behind the W’s in September, with a 5-2 record on a .739 winning percentage. JD Martinez got profiled on MLB.com, I think it was, as a candidate for an MLB-wide triple crown. What heady days in Pittsburgh!
.
Flint Hill: “W”, 4 – 5. (42 PA, .286, .405, .486; 6.3 ip, 6 er, 8.53 ERA) Marcus Semien went 2 for 2 with a homer and two walks to lead the Tornado surge — which Archie Bradley, bereft these days of his brother and former teammate Jackie Bradley, Jr., blunted with a sextuple chulk (0.3 ip, 2er).
.
Haviland: W, 9 – 9. (38 PA, .219, .342, .469; 11.3 ip, 11 er, 8.74 ERA). While we’re on the topic of singing, one of the unsung tragedies of our most recent draft occurred when the Dragons outbid the Wolverine’s draft budget to snatch away Matt Holliday. Holliday went 2 for 3 with a double, a homer, and a walk yesterday. Had he been allowed to rejoin the Wolverines, as he has longed to do for many years now, the W’s would still be ahead. Instead, the Dragons buried that wonderful performance in the context of a team that otherwise went 5 for 29 (.171, .294, .310) and surrendered as many earned runs as innings completed.
.
Cottage: DNP, 0 – 0. (28 PA, .292, .393, .333; 1 ip, 1 er). There is no way those stats should produce a perfect double-0 outcome. I need to check my meds.
.
Kaline: L, 4 – 8. (40 PA, .211, .250, .395; 5 ip, 2 er, 3.60 ERA). Tom asked yesterday if any team had ever outperformed the Outs in its first year, noting it had not been done in his memory. And he’s right. The only two times a team arguably did better were the league’s first two years. The Drive joined us in 2006, the league’s third season.
.
The Wolverines won the EFL the first year, although we don’t know what the record was (the data is lost) and the league only had 4 teams. (We have a standings report from August 2004 showing the Wolverines in first place at 69 – 44, a .611 winning percentage, a little better than Brookland’s was at the same point). The Alleghenys won the EFL in 2005, their first year, with a 91 – 71 record, a .560 winning percentage. The Outs could rally to beat the Allegheny’s first year winning percentage, but are unlikely to finish first. On the other hand, the competitive environment in the EFL is no doubt tougher now than it was then. There were no Dragons, let alone Rosebuds, back then.
.
Peshastin: L, 6 – 6. (25 PA, .333, .320, .750; 6 ip, 3 er, 4.50 ERA). I don’t know why we have that one set of August standings as our only record of the 2004 season. What was so special about that day? I suspect the answer can be found by looking at the entire standings table:
Old Detroit Wolverines |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
44 |
|
0.611 |
Peshastin Pears |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
45 |
|
0.602 |
Canberra Kangaroos |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
61 |
|
0.500 |
Victoria Roses |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
60 |
|
0.469 |
Notice the W’s are 1 game ahead of the Pears. The Pears had been running in first place for most of the mmiddle part of the season. I suspect this was the first day the W’s were clearly in the lead.
.
DC: L, 3 – 7. (40 PA, .162, .225, .189; 14 ip, 7 er). The only standout performance for the Balk yesterday was Carlos Carrasco’s 8 ip, 1 er tour of pitching duty. Dylan Bundy undid most of that with his 4 ip, 6 er, and the rest of the team completed the demolition project.
.
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2018
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Boston Red Sox |
97 |
45 |
.683 |
— |
Old Detroit Wolverines |
91 |
51 |
.642 |
5.8 |
New York Yankees |
88 |
53 |
.624 |
8.5 |
Tampa Bay Rays |
76 |
64 |
.543 |
20 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes |
74 |
68 |
.520 |
23.2 |
Toronto Blue Jays |
64 |
77 |
.454 |
32.5 |
Baltimore Orioles |
41 |
100 |
.291 |
55.5 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Canberra Kangaroos |
79 |
62 |
.560 |
— |
Atlanta Braves |
77 |
64 |
.546 |
1.9 |
Philadelphia Phillies |
74 |
66 |
.529 |
4.4 |
Washington Nationals |
69 |
72 |
.489 |
9.9 |
New York Mets |
63 |
77 |
.450 |
15.4 |
D.C. Balk |
62 |
79 |
.437 |
17.2 |
Miami Marlins |
56 |
85 |
.397 |
22.9 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Cleveland Indians |
80 |
61 |
.567 |
— |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys |
75 |
66 |
.535 |
4.6 |
Minnesota Twins |
64 |
76 |
.457 |
15.5 |
Detroit Tigers |
58 |
83 |
.411 |
22 |
Chicago White Sox |
56 |
85 |
.397 |
24 |
Kansas City Royals |
46 |
94 |
.329 |
33.5 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Chicago Cubs |
83 |
57 |
.593 |
— |
Brookland Outs |
80 |
60 |
.574 |
2.7 |
Milwaukee Brewers |
80 |
62 |
.563 |
4 |
St. Louis Cardinals |
78 |
63 |
.553 |
5.5 |
Pittsburgh Pirates |
70 |
71 |
.496 |
13.5 |
Cottage Cheese |
67 |
73 |
.481 |
15.6 |
Cincinnati Reds |
60 |
82 |
.423 |
24 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Houston Astros |
88 |
53 |
.624 |
— |
Oakland A’s |
85 |
57 |
.599 |
3.5 |
Seattle Mariners |
78 |
63 |
.553 |
10 |
Haviland Dragons |
71 |
70 |
.502 |
17.2 |
Los Angeles Angels |
69 |
72 |
.489 |
19 |
Kaline Drive |
66 |
75 |
.468 |
22 |
Texas Rangers |
61 |
80 |
.433 |
27 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Portland Rosebuds |
90 |
50 |
.644 |
— |
Colorado Rockies |
77 |
63 |
.550 |
13.2 |
Los Angeles Dodgers |
77 |
64 |
.546 |
13.7 |
Arizona Diamondbacks |
76 |
65 |
.539 |
14.7 |
San Francisco Giants |
68 |
74 |
.479 |
23.2 |
Peshastin Pears |
65 |
75 |
.464 |
25.2 |
San Diego Padres |
56 |
87 |
.392 |
35.7 |