N.B. Read the intro BEFORE you skip down to the team write-ups, or else nothing will make sense.
N.B.B. We have had our first three submissions, which are included below. Thanks!
The age if misinformation is upon us, and media conglomerates are responsible. How do we know whom we should trust, and why? One news outlet will run the same story as another news outlet but with a different slant, and we are left to determine which is telling the story accurately, if indeed any of them are. We see this most glaringly in the many reports about COVID-19, the vaccine, and the current health crisis enveloping the world.
And it appears that even in baseball there are two different stories of one event in which we must decide who is, indeed, telling the truth. Our case study this morning comes from current Roo (a player recently lauded by MLB and also our own commissioner) Kyle Tucker. Here is the video of yesterday’s event, and the question I would like you to answer before continuing to read this update:
This clip shows Kyle Tucker getting picked off of third base with one out in the 6th inning of a tied baseball game. Was he:
a) Trying something daring (stealing home) in order to help his team win?
b) Bored, and wanting the game to end as soon as possible?
c) Making sure the Diamondbacks could not appeal Yuli Gurriel’s tag up on a fly ball?
d) Playing a game of pickle in the middle of an MLB contest
What did you answer? This morning I woke up to two different interpretations of this play, from two different media sources. The first article was one I stumbled up on Baseball Prospectus. If you are not a subscriber to BP I don’t think you’ll be able to read it. Here is an excerpt from it, though, about this play: “The video reveals that everyone on the field, save Tucker, knew exactly what was going to happen like it were a Halloween showing of Rocky Horror Picture Show. Even more damning is third baseman Josh VanMeter, wielding all the cumulative boredom and fatigue of a hundred losses, standing at third and signaling for the ball before the runner had even made his break.” The author of this article is “Baseball Prospectus Editors.” It’s as if they don’t want the reader to know who wrote it, because in it they lambaste Tucker for his decision to try and steal home in this situation, saying, “Sometimes you’re so wrong about something that you just fall down.”
Reading the article and watching the video made me come to conclusion that Tucker, indeed, made a dumb decision that could have potentially cost his team the game. But then I opened my email and saw an email sent to me by Ron in the middle of the night (ok, 11pm is hardly the middle of the night but I was in bed). It was a link to a tweet from Jomboy, which included the above video accompanied by these words: “Kyle Tucker gets picked off on purpose because the Astros think that Yuli Gurriel left too early on a sacrifice fly.”
And so I watched the video again, and sure enough, it seemed like Jomboy was right (if you don’t know Jomboy, he is the Yankee fan/content producer who helped uncover the Astros cheating scandal and has turned that into a very successful media outlet, though fair warning – he uses a lot of bad language in his videos).
In older times I would have sided with the more seasoned BP writers when having to choose between two interpretations, especially if someone with the name “Jomboy” was offering one of the opinions. But, in my opinion, Jomboy is absolutely correct (and it pains me to say that as much as, I am sure, it pained Jomboy to laud an Astros player).
Nothing is spared from our own interpretive lenses, even when we believe we are just, “reporting what we saw.” This is true even of these updates, in which I (and Ron) write about your players, interpreting their performance as though we are just reporting what we see in the box score. Oftentimes, when writing the update, I wonder what you, the owner, might see, or how you might tell the story of your team’s performance from the day before. It might be a fun experience to have you comment, if you can, on this post with your own write up of your team. How might it differ from mine? What might you focus on? What do you see that I didn’t see?
So, today’s update will be sparse, because I want to see what you see. This is by no means a requirement for you to do, for you might be unable to do so or perhaps lack any desire to do so. But if you can and want to, indulge me for just today.
Here’s what to do: simply send me an email with your write-up. It doesn’t have to be long, at all. When I get them, I’ll go in and add it to the post, and at the end we’ll have an update written by all of us, with many different eyes through which to see. As a reminder, you can look up the daily stats for your team on this EFL page.
Have fun!
EFL Standings for 2021
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
RS |
RA |
Old Detroit Wolverines |
104 |
46 |
.696 |
— |
865.1 |
571.5 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes |
99 |
51 |
.658 |
5.7 |
838.3 |
596.6 |
D.C. Balk |
92 |
55 |
.627 |
10.7 |
842.6 |
649.7 |
Kaline Drive |
91 |
58 |
.614 |
12.4 |
788.2 |
624.8 |
Peshastin Pears |
91 |
59 |
.605 |
13.6 |
760.4 |
620.7 |
Cottage Cheese |
82 |
67 |
.548 |
22.3 |
819.7 |
759.2 |
Canberra Kangaroos |
81 |
66 |
.548 |
22.3 |
781.4 |
722.0 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys |
81 |
68 |
.541 |
23.4 |
740.7 |
681.7 |
Haviland Dragons |
79 |
70 |
.530 |
25 |
763.1 |
743.0 |
Bellingham Cascades |
77 |
72 |
.514 |
27.4 |
632.2 |
615.8 |
Portland Rosebuds |
73 |
77 |
.490 |
31 |
787.9 |
816.3 |
Old Detroit: W, 11-(-3); 55PA, 12.3IP
AVG: 0.353 |
OBP: 0.400 |
SLG: 0.627 |
OPS: 1.027 |
The Wolverines needed a day like yesterday! Shane McClanahan came back from the dead — or at least, the IL — to pitch 5 strong innings (1 earned run), and Logan Gilbert put together the second best start of his season (7 ip, 1 er) to temporarily erase some replacement innings. And the much-maligned Gavin Lux, recently back from the dog house, went 3 for 4 with a home run to lead a robust Wolverine offense.
Despite all the grousing by Old Detroit management, Lux has been allocated 100% at OH all month. Originally it was to make sure OD had the minimum number of active players, taking solace in Lux’s exile to OK. Since Lux was recalled from Oklahoma City on September 10, Lux has gone .458, .552, .708. OD has too many OH, so his work is being heavily suppressed, but still… redemption is a wonderful thing, even at the cost of my embarrassment. (In case Mark J doesn’t get around to this, Luis Urias over the about same period has batted .243, .391, .351 — solid numbers, especially with that OBP, but for ONCE Lux has been better.)
Flint Hill: W, 9-7; 67PA, 8IP
AVG: 0.339 |
OBP: 0.403 |
SLG: 0.678 |
OPS: 1.081 |
Thankfully Brad Boxberger and Hirokazu Sawamura are both on the bench, because if not, yesterday would have been bad. They combined to give up 5 runs in 1 innings. Yikes! The hitting was really good, and it had to be because the Wolverines had an excellent day on both the mound (erasing replacement innings) and at the plate (scoring 11 total runs). By my calculations, I will need to make up one game every three days from here until the end of the season in order to catch the Wolverines. That is a tall task, and the only hope I have is that they will not be able to stave off replacement innings. But if they can score more than 8 runs every day, it won’t really matter.
DC: “L,” 4-2: 44PA, 7IP
AVG: 0.143 |
OBP: 0.295 |
SLG: 0.286 |
OPS: 0.581 |
With great pitching and humdrum hitting the Balk outscored their opponent yesterday, except EFL statisticians yet again inexplicably found a roundabout way to transmogrify it into a “loss.” How cute. Deb hurler Eli Morgan and some reliever combined for seven innings and just one earned run, but too many Balk hitters suffered from ofer-ism to save the day. Matt Chapman tried to counter his teammates’ batting malaise by swatting a homer and a double, but it wasn’t enough to sway the stingy EFL number-crunchers and their aggravating algorithms.
Kaline: W, 3-0; 43PA, 16IP
AVG: 0.250 |
OBP: 0.302 |
SLG: 0.325 |
OPS: 0.627 |
Peshastin: “W,” 6-8; 31PA, .7IP
AVG: 0.370 |
OBP: 0.452 |
SLG: 0.481 |
OPS: 0.933 |
Ugh. Can anyone around here pitch? Or at least try?
Cottage: L, 1-5; 47PA, 10.3IP
AVG: 0.175 |
OBP: 0.261 |
SLG: 0.300 |
OPS: 0.561 |
I see “meh.” The Cheese have not hit much since September began, and the pitching has been inconsistent. Cottage drafted four debutant pitchers, all with impeccable credentials, at the draft. Apparently their credentials were part of this misinformation that Jamie is writing about, because none of the four (Luis Gil, Daniel Lynch, Bailey Ober, and Matt Manning) have had records even remotely resembling those from their pre-Cheese lives. Other Cheese pitchers like Taijuan Walker and Josiah Gray, who did so well in August, have pretty much fallen apart in September. The GOOD Cheese pitchers (Ohtani and Ray) have done well, and the above results would have been much better if the Dodgers had not skipped Gonsolin’s turn in the rotation and stuck him in the game after Kershaw. Gonsolin has been up and down, like Sean Manaea, and he ruined the Cheese pitching line last night. Good hitting from Cottage in September has come only from Verdugo and Alejandro Kirk, who only plays less than half the time. Everyone else is “meh.”
Canberra: L, 5-10; 33PA, 4IP
AVG: 0.258 |
OBP: 0.303 |
SLG: 0.452 |
OPS: 0.755 |
Pittsburgh: W, 2-1; 19PA, 19.1IP
AVG: 0.118 |
OBP: 0.211 |
SLG: 0.176 |
OPS: 0.387 |
Haviland: L, 2-6; 29PA, 3.3IP
AVG: 0.207 |
OBP: 0.207 |
SLG: 0.379 |
OPS: 0.586 |
Bellingham: L, 0-5; 47PA, 4.6IP
AVG: 0.178 |
OBP: 0.213 |
SLG: 0.222 |
OPS: 0.435 |
Portland: “L,” 4-2; 34PA, 15.3IP
AVG: 0.192 |
OBP: 0.353 |
SLG: 0.346 |
OPS: 0.699 |
A great month continues, leading Rosebud management to see brighter blossoms ahead. Veteran Corey Seager led the way offensively and Eric Lauer continues to cement his role for ’22 and beyond.
It’s been a dreadful year, but we have seen some surprise blooms, some expected beauty, and learned which petals are withered and need a trim.
Though we may have performed too well for the top pick overall in the rookie draft, we are looking forward to adding to our talent pool.
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2021
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Old Detroit Wolverines |
104 |
46 |
.696 |
— |
Flint Hill Tornadoes |
99 |
51 |
.658 |
5.7 |
Tampa Bay Rays |
92 |
58 |
.613 |
12.4 |
Boston Red Sox |
86 |
65 |
.570 |
18.9 |
Toronto Blue Jays |
84 |
65 |
.564 |
19.9 |
New York Yankees |
83 |
67 |
.553 |
21.4 |
Baltimore Orioles |
47 |
102 |
.315 |
56.9 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
D.C. Balk |
92 |
55 |
.627 |
— |
Canberra Kangaroos |
81 |
66 |
.548 |
11.6 |
Atlanta Braves |
77 |
70 |
.524 |
15.2 |
Philadelphia Phillies |
76 |
73 |
.510 |
17.2 |
New York Mets |
73 |
77 |
.487 |
20.7 |
Miami Marlins |
63 |
86 |
.423 |
30.2 |
Washington Nationals |
61 |
88 |
.409 |
32.2 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Chicago White Sox |
85 |
64 |
.570 |
— |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys |
81 |
68 |
.541 |
4.4 |
Bellingham Cascades |
77 |
72 |
.514 |
8.5 |
Cleveland Indians |
73 |
74 |
.497 |
11 |
Detroit Tigers |
72 |
78 |
.480 |
13.5 |
Kansas City Royals |
67 |
82 |
.450 |
18 |
Minnesota Twins |
65 |
85 |
.433 |
20.5 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Milwaukee Brewers |
91 |
58 |
.611 |
— |
Cottage Cheese |
82 |
67 |
.548 |
9.4 |
St. Louis Cardinals |
79 |
69 |
.534 |
11.5 |
Cincinnati Reds |
77 |
73 |
.513 |
14.5 |
Chicago Cubs |
67 |
83 |
.447 |
24.5 |
Pittsburgh Pirates |
56 |
93 |
.376 |
35 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
Kaline Drive |
91 |
58 |
.614 |
— |
Houston Astros |
88 |
61 |
.591 |
3.5 |
Oakland A’s |
82 |
67 |
.550 |
9.5 |
Seattle Mariners |
80 |
69 |
.537 |
11.5 |
Haviland Dragons |
79 |
70 |
.530 |
12.5 |
Los Angeles Angels |
72 |
77 |
.483 |
19.5 |
Texas Rangers |
55 |
94 |
.369 |
36.5 |
TEAM |
WINS |
LOSSES |
PCT. |
GB |
San Francisco Giants |
97 |
53 |
.647 |
— |
Los Angeles Dodgers |
96 |
54 |
.640 |
1 |
Peshastin Pears |
91 |
59 |
.605 |
6.2 |
San Diego Padres |
76 |
73 |
.510 |
20.5 |
Portland Rosebuds |
73 |
77 |
.490 |
23.6 |
Colorado Rockies |
70 |
79 |
.470 |
26.5 |
Arizona Diamondbacks |
48 |
101 |
.322 |
48.5 |
So, apparently Gurriel was on third before this play? He failed to tag up properly? How did Tucker get to third? Advance from second on the same fly ball Gurriel went home on? Too many unanswered questions. Could be deliberate, I suppose, and if so, trash-can bangin’ smart.
Great idea, Jamie, letting owners write their own comments. Sort of like Tom Sawyer getting everyone else to paint the fence. Also, gave your brother a chance to rub my nose in Eric Lauer’s success, after I let him go for nothing.
[…] in his name. The Rosebuds’ owner did post, late, comments on his own team yesterday. Check them out. Their “great month” continues, and has brought them back to the brink of being less […]