If you don’t subscribe to Bill James Online, what is the matter with you? For one of many, many things, it means you missed (so far) Steve Goldleaf’s little essay on lineup poetry.
Goldleaf never took one of my classes. So he has logorrhea. But partly choked in all those weeds is a delightful review of Charles North’s 2009 book of poetry, Complete Lineups.
Like this one:
Patio 2b
Bathroom ss
Dining Room cf
Living Room 1b
Bedroom 3b
Foyer lf
Hall rf
Garage c
Kitchen p
I can’t argue with that one, especially with the brilliant positioning of the Garage. Here’s another:
San Francisco ss
Munich cf
Paris lf
Rome c
Madrid 3b
London rf
Athens 1b
Istanbul 2b
New York p
But this poem is all wrong. Clearly this would be better:
Prague cf
Florence ss
Paris 3b
London 1b
Seattle lf
Boston rf
Vancouver c
Portland 2b
Geneva p
I admit I am not sure what makes a city a pitcher. I’ve never scouted Geneva. Maybe Geneva can pitch. Or Cinque Terra? Maybe Honolulu? Wellington? I’ve been to Sydney, Amsterdam, and Copenhagen. I suppose they could pitch. I probably have a rotation here: Geneva, Amsterdam, Wellington, Sydney, Copenhagen. I suppose Nassau, Cinque Terra, Bellingham, and Victoria could be relievers. Maybe Salzburg can close: only two pitches, but a knockout.
My lineup above is for a good team of diverse skills and attractive personalities — a 1995 – 2001 Mariners, or most Cardinals teams. Their arch-nemesis, the team that likes to beat up a season and leave it for dead in a November ditch, would look more like this:
Los Angeles 3b
Chicago 1b
New York c
Moscow rf
Beijing lf
Pyongyang cf
Newark 2b
Port au Prince ss
Las Vegas p
OK, maybe I am beginning to get a glimmer of what a pitcher city looks like.
One more lineup poem before we get to the prosaic standings:
Portland cf
Canberra ss
Haviland 3b
Pittsburgh 1b
Old Detroit c
Peshastin p
Cottage rf
Kaline 2b
Flint Hill lf
DC rover
Yes, of course it’s a softball team. What did you expect?
EFL | ||||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB | RS | RA |
Peshastin Pears | 6 | 2 | .748 | — | 38.7 | 22.5 |
Cottage Cheese | 5 | 2 | .703 | 0.6 | 35.3 | 23.0 |
Haviland Dragons | 4 | 3 | .607 | 1.2 | 37.9 | 30.5 |
Canberra Kangaroos | 4 | 3 | .549 | 1.6 | 34.3 | 31.1 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 3 | 2 | .564 | 1.7 | 20.4 | 17.9 |
Kaline Drive | 4 | 3 | .519 | 1.9 | 20.1 | 19.3 |
Portland Rosebuds | 4 | 4 | .453 | 2.4 | 31.2 | 34.2 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 2 | 4 | .323 | 3 | 18.5 | 26.8 |
D.C. Balk | 2 | 5 | .340 | 3.1 | 32.8 | 45.7 |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 1 | 4 | .262 | 3.2 | 14.6 | 24.5 |
AL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Baltimore Orioles | 4 | 1 | .800 | — |
Tampa Bay Rays | 5 | 3 | .625 | 0.5 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 3 | 2 | .564 | 1.2 |
Boston Red Sox | 3 | 3 | .500 | 1.5 |
New York Yankees | 3 | 4 | .429 | 2 |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 1 | 4 | .262 | 2.7 |
Toronto Blue Jays | 1 | 5 | .167 | 3.5 |
NL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Washington Nationals | 4 | 3 | .571 | — |
New York Mets | 4 | 3 | .571 | — |
Canberra Kangaroos | 4 | 3 | .549 | 0.2 |
Miami Marlins | 3 | 3 | .500 | 0.5 |
Philadelphia Phillies | 3 | 4 | .429 | 1 |
D.C. Balk | 2 | 5 | .340 | 1.6 |
Atlanta Braves | 1 | 5 | .167 | 2.5 |
AL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Minnesota Twins | 5 | 1 | .833 | — |
Detroit Tigers | 4 | 2 | .667 | 1 |
Cleveland Indians | 3 | 3 | .500 | 2 |
Chicago White Sox | 2 | 3 | .400 | 2.5 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 2 | 4 | .323 | 3.1 |
Kansas City Royals | 2 | 5 | .286 | 3.5 |
NL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Chicago Cubs | 5 | 2 | .714 | — |
Cincinnati Reds | 5 | 2 | .714 | — |
Cottage Cheese | 5 | 2 | .703 | 0.1 |
Pittsburgh Pirates | 3 | 3 | .500 | 1.5 |
St. Louis Cardinals | 2 | 5 | .286 | 3 |
Milwaukee Brewers | 2 | 5 | .286 | 3 |
AL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Los Angeles Angels | 5 | 2 | .714 | — |
Haviland Dragons | 4 | 3 | .607 | 0.7 |
Kaline Drive | 4 | 3 | .519 | 1.4 |
Houston Astros | 4 | 4 | .500 | 1.5 |
Oakland A’s | 4 | 4 | .500 | 1.5 |
Texas Rangers | 2 | 4 | .333 | 2.5 |
Seattle Mariners | 2 | 6 | .250 | 3.5 |
NL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Arizona Diamondbacks | 6 | 2 | .750 | — |
Peshastin Pears | 6 | 2 | .748 | — |
Colorado Rockies | 5 | 3 | .625 | 1 |
Los Angeles Dodgers | 4 | 4 | .500 | 2 |
San Diego Padres | 4 | 4 | .500 | 2 |
Portland Rosebuds | 4 | 4 | .453 | 2.4 |
San Francisco Giants | 3 | 5 | .375 | 3 |
2 comments:
1) When did Kaline change their team name to “eeee”? It’s not a very good name.
2) I never took your class either. Does that mean I have logorrhea too?
And a question: where do I make that change? Is this in one of those secret “only the Commissioner knows” programs?
Thanks, Dave, for pointing out the eeeee that got pasted over the Kaline line. I’ve fixed it, to erase any impression that I might have dozed off for a second with my finger on the “e.”
As for the 2014 thing: this is what comes up when I use the Daily Commish functions you set up so nicely. The MLB/EFL standings it produces refer to 2014. Sometimes I fix it, or write over the entire line, but I thought it might be nice if it came up automatically “2017” like the date atop the EFL-only standings does.
And one more thing: If the Wolverines are still in last place next week, they won’t be batting fifth in my lineup poem anymore.
Thank you, James Paxton! 13 inn. 0 ER