Thursday night only four games were played in MLB, producing only about 13% of a full day of action. So changes in the EFL standings were exceptionally small.
.
But the infinitesimal is not always insignificant.
.
EFL Standings for 2018
EFL | ||||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB | RS | RA |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 91 | 50 | .643 | — | 698.6 | 511.6 |
Portland Rosebuds | 89 | 50 | .643 | 0.2 | 745.5 | 543.5 |
Brookland Outs | 80 | 60 | .574 | 9.8 | 746.1 | 649.9 |
Canberra Kangaroos | 78 | 62 | .560 | 11.7 | 648.4 | 578.9 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 75 | 65 | .536 | 15.1 | 741.0 | 694.3 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 73 | 68 | .520 | 17.3 | 651.4 | 620.5 |
Haviland Dragons | 70 | 70 | .503 | 19.7 | 649.3 | 640.5 |
Cottage Cheese | 67 | 73 | .481 | 22.8 | 667.5 | 693.0 |
Kaline Drive | 66 | 74 | .471 | 24.2 | 606.8 | 645.3 |
Peshastin Pears | 65 | 74 | .464 | 25.1 | 593.2 | 638.8 |
D.C. Balk | 62 | 78 | .440 | 28.6 | 611.1 | 689.5 |
.
Old Detroit: W 1, L (-1); 0.2 – (-1.1). (26 PA, .227, .346, .409; 1 ip, 0 er, 0.00 ERA). The W’s switched a loss to a win, barely — adding only .001 to their winning percentage. This was enough to move the W’s 0.1 games closer to Boston, who didn’t play and thus provide a handy fixed point against which to measure. This is the tiny margin by which Old Detroit led Portland at the end of August.
.
Portland: DNP, 1.3 – o.2. (19 PA, .263, .263, .526; 7.3 ip, 3 er, 3.68 ERA) Portland’s hitters added a sliver to their team’s September raw OPS — about .002, I’d guess, although I think the positive influence might have been greater by being concentrated in the right places. Their pitchers (Bieber and Andriese) raised the team’s ERA ever so slightly — just barely less than the hitters raised the OPS, apparently. Portland’s winning percentage didn’t change perceptibly, they remained o.2 behind, but the Wolverines erased the Rosebud’s ,001 winning percentage advantage from yesterday. If the ‘Buds suddenly added their two missing games without changing their winning percentage, the two teams would be tied, rather than the ‘Buds being 1.1 games ahead as I projected yesterday.
.
Infinitesimally small changes add up; the ‘Buds’ eventual assumption of first place is delayed a day, maybe. Do that 23 more times and it won’t happen until October, which will suit the Wolverines just fine.
.
Brookland: L, 6.7 – 6.8. (5 PA, .200, .200, .800; 5 ip, 3 er). Yes, the Brookland offense can provide almost 6 runs entirely on momentum, to which Schott Schebler added a homer. Sanchez’ 3 er in 5 ip, supplemented by two innings of replacement relief, left the Outs slightly underwater for the day.
.
Canberra: “L”, 3.9 – 1.8. (9 PA, .222, .222, .333; 1 ip, 0 er, 0.00 ERA). The Kangaroos not only have a miniscule 1.82 ERA this month, they have enough innings to handle playing a game with only 1 inning of relief pitching. I should say the had enough innings: they currently have 12 relief innings for 6 September games, exactly enough to cover the 6 games they’ve played, thanks to the heroic inning provided by newly-pilfered-from-the-Rosebuds Kirby Yates yesterday. I am feeling much better about the Paxton/Yates trade right now…
.
Pittsburgh: W, 6.3 – 3.3. (17 PA, .286, .412, .500; 5.7 ip., 2 er, 3.18 ERA). The Alleghenys got a little more than half a game’s production from yesterday’s 4/15ths of an MLB schedule. This allowed them to gain 0.1 games on the Wolverines, and similar amounts on the teams just north and south of them.
.
Flint Hill: DNP, 2.6 – 0.0. (12 PA, .250, .250, .833; no pitching). Francisco Mejia’s 2 homer starting debut for the Padres lifted the Tornados, too, lifting their winning percentage .001 and keeping them on the Wolverines’ pace. Probably the worst news of the day for the Wolverines, since now Mejia will eat into Austin Hedges’ playing time. Sigh.
.
Haviland: W (-1), L 1; (-2.8 – 1.7) (24 PA, .150, .292, .200; 1.3 ip, 2 er). Almost a game’s worth of poor offense, and a sliver or two of poor pitching… When I came up with this infinitesimal theme, I was thinking about snowflakes piling up to make a beautiful scene. But infinitesimals can also compound into unpleasant things, too, like a peach gone a little too bad just a few hours after it was still really good.
.
Cottage: L, 3.2 – 7.4. (2 PA, .500, .500, .500; 0.7 ip, 0 er). This is almost as infinitesimal as you can get and still be there. 2 plate appearances is one more than the minimum, so much so that Margot’s single creates an apparently towering 1.000 OPS (until you realize you are looking through a electron microscope). Adam Cimber’s 2/3 of an inning pitched, with no baserunners allowed, is one batter more than the minimum, and only takes micron off the 7.50 ERA earned by the replacements who completed yesterday’s game at the Cottage.
.
Kaline: DNP, 2.1 – (-1.4). (19 PA, .375, .421, .625; 1 ip, 0 er). The Drive made good use of their day off, sneaking in 19 marvelous plate appearances and one stellar inning, allowing them to quietly gain 0.8 games on the Cottage on an off day. Think what they might do with an actual game day!
.
Peshastin: DNP, (-3.9) – 0. (21 PA, .190, .190, .190; no pitching). The Pears want you to understand what 4 for 21 looks like: .190. They didn’t pollute the data with walks or extra bases. They don’t distract you with pitching numbers. They tell you simple and straight, three times: 4 for 21 is .190. It’s .190. .190. Don’t forget it.
.
D.C.: “W”, 2.8 – 4.5 (4 PA, .000, .000, .000; no pitching). The Unbearable Lightness of Being is a book. By Milos Kundera, as I recall. I have read it. I believe it is in our library. But you don’t need to read it. Rob can tell you all about it.
.
I do not recall any prior occasion on which an EFL team did so little. This is so little it may be just beyond the limits of the infinitesimal.
.
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2018
AL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Boston Red Sox | 97 | 44 | .688 | — |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 91 | 50 | .643 | 6.4 |
New York Yankees | 87 | 53 | .621 | 9.5 |
Tampa Bay Rays | 75 | 64 | .540 | 21 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 73 | 68 | .520 | 23.7 |
Toronto Blue Jays | 63 | 77 | .450 | 33.5 |
Baltimore Orioles | 41 | 99 | .293 | 55.5 |
NL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Canberra Kangaroos | 78 | 62 | .560 | — |
Atlanta Braves | 77 | 63 | .550 | 1.4 |
Philadelphia Phillies | 73 | 66 | .525 | 4.9 |
Washington Nationals | 69 | 72 | .489 | 9.9 |
New York Mets | 63 | 76 | .453 | 14.9 |
D.C. Balk | 62 | 78 | .440 | 16.9 |
Miami Marlins | 56 | 84 | .400 | 22.4 |
AL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Cleveland Indians | 80 | 60 | .571 | — |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 75 | 65 | .536 | 5 |
Minnesota Twins | 63 | 76 | .453 | 16.5 |
Detroit Tigers | 57 | 83 | .407 | 23 |
Chicago White Sox | 56 | 84 | .400 | 24 |
Kansas City Royals | 46 | 93 | .331 | 33.5 |
NL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Chicago Cubs | 83 | 57 | .593 | — |
Brookland Outs | 80 | 60 | .574 | 2.7 |
Milwaukee Brewers | 79 | 62 | .560 | 4.5 |
St. Louis Cardinals | 78 | 62 | .557 | 5 |
Pittsburgh Pirates | 69 | 71 | .493 | 14 |
Cottage Cheese | 67 | 73 | .481 | 15.6 |
Cincinnati Reds | 59 | 82 | .418 | 24.5 |
AL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Houston Astros | 87 | 53 | .621 | — |
Oakland A’s | 84 | 57 | .596 | 3.5 |
Seattle Mariners | 78 | 62 | .557 | 9 |
Haviland Dragons | 70 | 70 | .503 | 16.6 |
Los Angeles Angels | 68 | 72 | .486 | 19 |
Kaline Drive | 66 | 74 | .471 | 21.1 |
Texas Rangers | 61 | 79 | .436 | 26 |
NL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Portland Rosebuds | 89 | 50 | .643 | — |
Colorado Rockies | 77 | 62 | .554 | 12.4 |
Los Angeles Dodgers | 76 | 64 | .543 | 13.9 |
Arizona Diamondbacks | 75 | 65 | .536 | 14.9 |
San Francisco Giants | 68 | 73 | .482 | 22.4 |
Peshastin Pears | 65 | 74 | .464 | 24.9 |
San Diego Padres | 56 | 86 | .394 | 34.9 |
Has any first year team ever done as well as the Brooklyn Outs? Not in my memory, which is getting faultier.