Today we’ll clean up a few odd bits left on my desk during the last few days of interrupted updates. Including the above piece of art. Read on to find out what it’s about.
EFL Standings for 2021
EFL | ||||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB | RS | RA |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 89 | 40 | .694 | — | 739.9 | 491.5 |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 84 | 45 | .650 | 5.7 | 681.2 | 499.1 |
D.C. Balk | 81 | 47 | .630 | 8.4 | 731.4 | 561.8 |
Kaline Drive | 80 | 49 | .619 | 9.6 | 698.6 | 546.6 |
Peshastin Pears | 79 | 50 | .615 | 10.1 | 639.9 | 510.2 |
Cottage Cheese | 74 | 56 | .569 | 16 | 736.4 | 658.7 |
Haviland Dragons | 71 | 58 | .550 | 18.5 | 668.3 | 625.8 |
Canberra Kangaroos | 70 | 58 | .549 | 18.7 | 659.9 | 609.2 |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 71 | 60 | .539 | 19.9 | 658.9 | 608.4 |
Bellingham Cascades | 68 | 63 | .517 | 22.7 | 561.9 | 543.2 |
Portland Rosebuds | 61 | 68 | .472 | 28.6 | 674.2 | 719.2 |
Old Detroit: “L”, 6 – 2. (61 PA, .,273, .344, .345; 8 ip, 2 er 2.25 ERA). The Wolverine offense decided to make up for lack of quality with Kalinic heaps of volume. And it worked! Mostly because most of the weaker hitters were un- or under-allocated. Along with some very nice pitching (finally!), the Wolverines won yesterday… except they apparently owed the universe something, so had to accept an official loss. Breaking that 90-win barrier has proven to be a sticky wicket (if I have the cricket lingo right).
Flint Hill: W, 5 – 3. (51 PA, .205, .314, .386; 6.3 ip, 2 er 2.86 ERA). The Tornados had a slightly scaled-down version of the same day the Wolverines had — except Patrick Wisdom doubled the Wolverine home run total with 2 — the only Tornadic homers of the day. Nathan Eovaldi managed 5.3 innings, 2 er.
The other day Jamie told us “kind words cost nothing,” and lauded the Commissioner for saying nice things about various EFL teams, who responded by thinking better of themselves, having good days, and gaining on the Wolverines.
“Bah, humbug!!”, I said to myself. “Those kind words cost the Wolverines plenty, several games in the standings, probably, if you add up all the teams’ benefits. That Commissioner had better stop handing out kindness and leaving me with the bill.” So I have spoken to the Commissioner. Perhaps he paid attention, for once: the T’s lost 0.2 games in the standings.
DC: “W”, 1 – 7. (36 PA. .176, .194, .353; 1.3 IP, 0 ER) and
Kaline: W, 7 – 1. (46 PA, .317, .391, .512; 12.6 ip, 5 er, 3.57 ERA). Look at these two lines. The Balk got maybe the most lopsided “win” I’ve ever seen. The Drive were at the other end of the spectrum — close to deserving a 2-win, (-1) loss outcome. Here’s how this happened:
After Friday’s games, the NL East standings looked like this:
NL East after games of 8/27 | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
D.C. Balk | 80 | 47 | .634 | — |
Canberra Kangaroos | 70 | 57 | .551 | 10.5 |
Atlanta Braves | 69 | 58 | .543 | 11.5 |
With 80 wins, the Balk would be 11 games up on the Braves, but they actually were somewhere between 11.495001 and 11.499999. That .634 winning percentage would generate 80.514 wins, so it is also rounded up. Judging by their reported .634 winning percentage, the Balk had to have an actual winning percentage between .63382 and .63386, and an actual total of between 80.495 and 80.499 wins.
This morning the NL East looked like this:
NL East after games of 8/28 | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
D.C. Balk | 81 | 47 | .630 | — |
Canberra Kangaroos | 70 | 58 | .549 | 10.3 |
Atlanta Braves | 69 | 59 | .539 | 11.6 |
Note that the Braves lost their game while the Balk “won” theirs, but the Braves only slipped about 0.1 games in the standings. With the Braves somewhere between 11.5501 and 11.6449 games back, the Balk have to be between 80.5501 and 80.6449 wins. So their 1 – 7 score got them somewhere between 0.0602 and 0.1599 wins, enough to go from an extreme round-down to an almost equally extreme round-up.
Now for the Drive. They started play yesterday like this in the AL West:
AL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Kaline Drive | 79 | 49 | .615 | — |
Houston Astros | 76 | 52 | .594 | 2.8 |
They seem to have 3 more wins and 3 fewer losses than the Astros, but are only 2.8 games (ie, 2.7501 to 2.8499) games up. After winning 7 – 1, this morning’s standings look like this:
AL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Kaline Drive | 80 | 49 | .619 | — |
Houston Astros | 77 | 52 | .597 | 2.9 |
A 7 – 1 win is worth somewhere between 1.002 and 1.1998 wins, at least at this stage of the month. (It might be worth more earlier, and will be worth less later — in this case, up to three days later.) This is how both teams could “win” but the Drive could gain about 1.2 games on the Balk.
I love the EFL.
Peshastin: W, 8 – 3. (42 PA, .343, .429, .429; 7 ip, 2 er, 2.57 ERA). Still a little woozy, maybe, from the anaesthesia required to serve as the Commissioner’s guinea pigs in the hunt for errors in our data, the Pears hit no homers or triples. Still, they managed the unusual feat of matching their OBP with their SLG, on a cocktail of 3 doubles, 5 walks, a HBP and a SF. The win lifted the Pears 0.2 games in the standings, to the brink of sneaking back to within 10 games of first.
Cottage: W, 8 – 3. (55 PA, .283, .309, .509; 7.3 ip, 2 er, 2.47 ERA) The Cottage are the 5th EFL team to get pitching under 3.00 ERA Saturday, and the third to also get a full game’s worth of innings. Alek Manoah did the bulk of the work (6.3 ip,, 2 er) for the Cheese. Meanwhile Cottage squeezed a nice 7.6 runs out of a significantly smaller-looking offensive output. They cleverly suppressed about 1/3 of the “offense” provided by their OHs (Toro, Nimmo and Ohtani) who had combined to go 2 for 13 with one walk, which helps nudge the numbers toward a 7-run output.
Haviland: L, 4 – 8. (24 PA, .190, .292, .381; no pitching).The Dragons are not carrying around surplus innings. After the Dragon hurlers took their latest Haviland holiday, the team’s replacement innings were reached 47.6. I have been wondering if we need to find some ways to tweak the game to account for the significant increase in pitcher throughput in MLB, what with injuries, etc. But I think we are just experiencing what MLB teams are: having to use more replacement level pitchers. I presume MLB will adjust to this new trend by drafting an extra pitcher or two — or, like the Angels did in the free agent draft in July, drafting only pitchers.
At least the Dragons are enjoying Kyle Schwarber, who went 3 for 5 yesterday with a homer.
Canberra: L, 4 – 6. (35 PA, .265, .257, .412; 2 ip, 0 er , 0.00 ERA) The Athletic is running something they’re calling a “Mock Expansion Draft.” Nobody ever asks for permission to use my family’s name in these things, so I wasn’t surprised to see the Athletic continue this arrogant practice. In fact, my first reaction was “Hey! The EFL could use a Mock expansion draft. The Save Our School candidates who took over the local school board said they wanted to rebalance the board. And the board had 0 Johnsons. Our league has 4 of them. More Mocks is exactly what we need!”
Unfortunately, I don’t know where we’d find the Mocks to rebalance the league 4 to 4 between Mocks and Johnsons, let alone the majority of the members the SOS got in their “rebalancing.” Melanie was in the old league, but seems to have crossed it off her lifetime bucket list. Ben has done a draft for Ryan, but is going off to the Navy and not deep enough into baseball to sustain an EFL membership. Sam is more of a soccer guy. Melissa would be a great addition to the league, but doesn’t even like to hear me talk about the league for more than, say, 2 seconds at a time. Her husband, Rahul, is a gem of a son-in-law, but not in some of the ways Andre is a gem of a son-in-law.
My grandson Enzo has a lot of potential… but he’s only 9. Not many of us could stand being beaten by a 9 year old. It might shatter the league. His little brother Mateo will be 7 in a few week, but is already veering off into art and music. I have one of his paintings on my home office wall…
Ryan? Any ideas?
Oh, Ryan, by the way: you probably noticed the Dragons racing toward you in the standings. That probably explains why you recoiled 0.3 games backward yesterday. They’re now within 0.2 games. Push on through the flock of fleeing fire-breathing fantastic flyers. You’ll be fine.
Pittsburgh: W, 5 – 1. (19 PA, .200, .368, .267; 17 ip, 5 er, 2.65 ERA) Another excellent day of full-game pitching for an EFL team. The Alleghenys benefitted from matching 7 ip, 0 er outings by Frankie Montas and Logan Webb, cleaning up after a mess left by Vladimir Gutierrez (3 ip, 5 er). And, with a reasonable day at the plate, at least in terms of OBP, the Alleghenys turned it into a win, allowing them to keep pace with the Wolverines and sneak un-noticed closer to the Kangaroos and Dragons.
Luis Robert is now outperforming both Eloy Jimenez and Ke’Bryan Hayes. Sigh.
Bellingham: “W”, 2 – 2. (35 PA, .182, .229, .303; 6 ip, 1 er, 1.50 ERA) More stellar pitching with less inspiring offense, the theme of the day for the EFL. Like many other EFL teams, the offensive highlight was a single homer, this time by Rafael Ortega.
Portland: L, 2- 6. (40 PA, .171, .256, .286; 4.7 ip, 3 er, 5.74 ERA) The Rosebuds slipped a bit, but not outside the range of distances from first they’ve been maintaining lately. Dylan Carlson led the team with a homer, two singles and two walks in 6 plate appearances. Another guy doing better than Ke’Bryan lately. Sigh some more.
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2021
AL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Old Detroit Wolverines | 89 | 40 | .694 | — |
Flint Hill Tornadoes | 84 | 45 | .650 | 5.7 |
Tampa Bay Rays | 81 | 48 | .628 | 8.5 |
New York Yankees | 76 | 53 | .589 | 13.5 |
Boston Red Sox | 75 | 56 | .573 | 15.5 |
Toronto Blue Jays | 67 | 61 | .523 | 22 |
Baltimore Orioles | 40 | 88 | .313 | 49 |
NL East | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
D.C. Balk | 81 | 47 | .630 | — |
Canberra Kangaroos | 70 | 58 | .549 | 10.3 |
Atlanta Braves | 69 | 59 | .539 | 11.6 |
Philadelphia Phillies | 65 | 64 | .504 | 16.1 |
New York Mets | 62 | 67 | .481 | 19.1 |
Washington Nationals | 55 | 73 | .430 | 25.6 |
Miami Marlins | 54 | 76 | .415 | 27.6 |
AL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Chicago White Sox | 75 | 56 | .573 | — |
Pittsburgh Alleghenys | 71 | 60 | .539 | 4.4 |
Bellingham Cascades | 68 | 63 | .517 | 7.2 |
Cleveland Indians | 63 | 64 | .496 | 10 |
Detroit Tigers | 62 | 68 | .477 | 12.5 |
Kansas City Royals | 59 | 70 | .457 | 15 |
Minnesota Twins | 57 | 72 | .442 | 17 |
NL Central | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Milwaukee Brewers | 78 | 52 | .600 | — |
Cottage Cheese | 74 | 56 | .569 | 4 |
Cincinnati Reds | 71 | 60 | .542 | 7.5 |
St. Louis Cardinals | 66 | 62 | .516 | 11 |
Chicago Cubs | 57 | 74 | .435 | 21.5 |
Pittsburgh Pirates | 47 | 83 | .362 | 31 |
AL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
Kaline Drive | 80 | 49 | .619 | — |
Houston Astros | 77 | 52 | .597 | 2.9 |
Haviland Dragons | 71 | 58 | .550 | 8.9 |
Oakland A’s | 71 | 59 | .546 | 9.4 |
Seattle Mariners | 69 | 61 | .531 | 11.4 |
Los Angeles Angels | 64 | 67 | .489 | 16.9 |
Texas Rangers | 44 | 85 | .341 | 35.9 |
NL West | ||||
TEAM | WINS | LOSSES | PCT. | GB |
San Francisco Giants | 84 | 45 | .651 | — |
Los Angeles Dodgers | 82 | 48 | .631 | 2.5 |
Peshastin Pears | 79 | 50 | .615 | 4.6 |
San Diego Padres | 69 | 62 | .527 | 16 |
Portland Rosebuds | 61 | 68 | .472 | 23.1 |
Colorado Rockies | 59 | 70 | .457 | 25 |
Arizona Diamondbacks | 44 | 87 | .336 | 41 |